The cost of catastrophes, construction, claims and reinsurance has pushed insurance premiums on many British Columbia condominiums through the roof.<\/p>\n
While petitions and critics call for government intervention, industry experts say it\u2019s a complex market issue with no easy fix. And for some, it\u2019s about to get worse.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe saw half of the stratas get hit on December 31, and the other half are going to get hit on April 30,\u201d said Mike Alavi, senior property manager with Korecki Real Estate Services Inc.<\/p>\n
The company manages 7,500 strata units across dozens of buildings in the Lower Mainland. Of the strata corporations that have recently renewed their insurance, Alavi said, around 90% saw premium increases of between 50% and 100%.<\/p>\n
That is well above the Insurance Bureau of Canada\u2019s (IBC) provincial average of 35%, but below some of the 300% to 600% increases Condominium Home Owners Association of BC (CHOA) executive director Tony Gioventu has heard of.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think what we\u2019ve seen is a correction in the market,\u201d Gioventu said. \u201cIt\u2019s not like it\u2019s exponentially incorrect, but it\u2019s just that it\u2019s happened all at once.\u201d<\/p>\n
CHOA reviewed BC insurance premiums dating back to the 1980s and 1990s and found that they are not far off from where they were before industry players began adjusting their rates this past year. Gioventu called it a \u201cbit of a revelation.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said on a low-risk building with a good insurance history, an insurance company charges between $0.13 and $0.15 per $100 of insured property. High-risk buildings \u2013 ones that are old and poorly maintained \u2013 might cost $0.22 per $100 of property.<\/p>\n
At that rate, insuring a high-risk property with a replacement value exceeding half a billion dollars \u2013 which exists in BC \u2013 might cost $1.1 million annually. In the event of a total loss, an insurer would be paying out roughly 455 times what it collected in premiums in a given year, meaning \u2013 all else equal \u2013 the insurer would have had to collect 455 years of insurance premiums to break even on the claim.<\/p>\n
Gioventu believes market competition is partly responsible for keeping insurance premiums relatively stagnant over the past several years, despite the fact that buildings have kept aging while property values have increased and risk has grown.<\/p>\n
The number of residential strata claims and what they cost has also risen. According to insurance broker BFL Canada, one in three stratas will submit a claim this year. Average losses now cost more than $50,000, and 54% of losses claimed are worth more than $100,000.<\/p>\n
Across the country, construction and repair costs have risen. Canadian insurers are getting squeezed by higher rates of reinsurance, which is insurance that insurers buy. Firms are often part of global companies that are dealing with more claims, more catastrophes and more risk of major catastrophic events.<\/p>\n
In 2018, Canadian property and casualty underwriters posted their largest loss in a decade. Their return on equity also hit 2% \u2013 the lowest level on record. The average return has fluctuated around 10.5% since 1975, according to IBC.<\/p>\n
Under pressure, a number of insurance providers exited Greater Vancouver\u2019s residential strata insurance market last summer.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt basically reached a tipping point last year,\u201d said Gareth McDonnell, regional vice-president of BFL Canada\u2019s western region.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s really a case of supply and demand, and the insurers that are left standing \u2026 are now being overwhelmed with too much demand pressure.\u201d<\/p>\n
In soft market conditions, a broker such as BFL Canada might work regularly with a dozen insurance companies to meet the insurance needs of strata corporations in the Greater Vancouver market. If the market is stable, it may not be difficult to find insurance on relatively preferable terms from within that panel of insurers.<\/p>\n
But the number of insurance providers willing to protect residential strata properties in the Lower Mainland has been shrinking over the last 12 to 18 months, and those left standing have become more selective with the risk they assume and how they price it.<\/p>\n
The market has corrected, as Gioventu put it.<\/p>\n
McDonnell said BFL Canada has reached out to more than 80 different insurance companies in Canada and abroad to fill the gaps left in the market by departing insurers.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat replacement support has been very difficult,\u201d McDonnell said, adding the risk that a building may not find a company willing to insure it is legitimate.<\/p>\n
Danielle Russell, partner and vice-president with insurance broker CapriCMW, told BIV that, historically, it would take between three and six insurance companies to cover a property, with each provider assuming a slice of a property\u2019s risk. In current market conditions, she said, that number can often be well in excess of 10.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019re seeing a dramatic increase in the number of insurance companies that you would need to provide insurance now, versus two years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n
This is one of the markers of a \u201chard\u201d insurance market, which is characterized by a reduction in available insurance capacity, increased risk scrutiny, higher premiums and higher deductibles.<\/p>\n
Markets across the country are being hit with premium increases, but McDonnell said insurers are choking on B.C.\u2019s earthquake risk profile, which comes with higher reinsurance rates and has caused premiums in Canada\u2019s westernmost province to rise faster.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have all these market forces that are coming around at the same time that the companies are reviewing their risk appetite and taking a lot closer look at their underwriting requirements,\u201d said Rob de Pruis, IBC\u2019s director of consumer and industry relations in Western Canada.<\/p>\n
Across the board, industry told BIV that increases in the number and severity of claims are a major force behind the sometimes shocking jump in premiums stratas face.<\/p>\n
Earlier this year, IBC struck a national task force to engage stakeholders across the country on the issue. After a meeting in Edmonton, the bureau released policy recommendations for addressing the affordability of strata insurance, including mandatory education for strata councils, building code amendments and a monetary cap on the amount a strata corporation can attempt to recover from an individual strata lot owner in the event of a loss.<\/p>\n
The IBC task force is scheduled to hold a meeting in Vancouver on March 17. CHOA is one of the stakeholders participating.<\/p>\n
Gioventu said maintaining and repairing buildings is the best way for strata councils to reduce their risk and mitigate premium increases. He urged strata corporations to complete depreciation reports, which identify building deficiencies and allow strata councils to plan for dealing with them before they create insurance issues. At present, strata corporations can waive the legal requirement to complete such a report.<\/p>\n
Homeowners should ensure their suites are maintained too, he explained, especially in connection with water issues, damage from which could result in an owner paying the building\u2019s deductible. That, he said, could bankrupt some people.<\/p>\n
Additionally, he believes regulatory tweaks to balance what strata corporations and individual owners are each responsible for covering could help spread liability across more individuals and individual insurance policies, thereby lowering premiums paid by the strata as a whole.<\/p>\n
Late last month, Kamloops-South Thompson MLA Todd Stone proposed legislative changes that would require individual owners to obtain liability insurance. His private member\u2019s bill would also require strata corporations to receive the terms of their insurance renewal at least 30 days in advance.<\/p>\n
According to Gioventu, stratas have been finding out the day before their insurance expires that their premiums are set to skyrocket.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is not a problem caused by the people of British Columbia. So there isn\u2019t a real easy solution by the people of British Columbia.\u201d<\/p>\n
Gioventu added that a proposal to create a public insurer warrants some caution.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe could go down the rabbit hole of a co-operative-style provincial insurer to discover that the insurance costs are in fact higher.\u201d \u2022<\/p>\n